|
DLynx at Rhodes College >
Academic Affairs, Office of >
History >
History, Department of. Honors Papers >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10267/13607
|
| Title: | “An Unprecedented Conversation”: The Limits of President Clinton’s Advisory Board on |
| Authors: | Barnes, Taykor E. |
| Keywords: | History, Department of Honors papers |
| Date Issued: | May-2009 |
| Publisher: | Memphis, Tenn. : Rhodes College |
| Abstract: | On June 14, 1997, President Clinton delivered the commencement speech at the
University of California, San Diego and unveiled “One America in the 21st Century: The
Presidential Initiative on Race” as the newest, and seemingly most personal, project to be
undertaken by his administration. The Initiative included the creation of the President’s
Advisory Board on Race, a seven-member team that would spend a year cultivating an
“unprecedented conversation” about race in the United States. Despite the enthusiasm
with which Clinton started the project, the Initiative and the Board have been largely
absent from discussion of the Clinton presidency and civil rights. This essay seeks to
explore the topic not only to shed light on a forgotten piece of history but to also
systematically question the role of the executive office in racial reparation and the limits
of that role. By examining primary sources such as speeches, press releases, and
interdepartmental correspondence from the Clinton Presidential Library and other media
v
sources, it becomes evident that the Board’s disappearance from the Clinton legacy is due
largely in part to its failure to live up to the expectations it created for itself. The essay
deconstructs the “rhetoric of action” that the Board fashioned and maintained throughout
its tenure and compares that rhetoric the actual capabilities of the Board. Ultimately, the
Board was incapable of fulfilling the role it presented to the public due to both logistical,
bureaucratic limitations as well as the problems inherent in attempting to resolve racial
inequality, demonstrating that the executive office has, despite past success, limited
effectiveness in the field of social justice in the modern United States. |
| Description: | Received as PDF from author. |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10267/13607 |
| Appears in Collections: | History, Department of. Honors Papers
|
Items in DLynx are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|