Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10267/15942
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGarceau-Hagen, Dee-
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-26T15:37:17Z-
dc.date.available2013-03-26T15:37:17Z-
dc.date.issued2013-01-09-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10267/15942-
dc.descriptionThis syllabus was submitted to the Office of Academic Affairs by the course instructor. Uploaded by Archives RSA Josephine Hill.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe term antisemitism was coined in 1879 by Wilhelm Marr in order to replace anti-Judaism with a secular, scientific construct based on racial theory that went beyond religious and cultural hostility. Marr's term came from the field of philology, which grouped together 'Semitic' languages. In the early nineteenth century, anthropologists and philosophers opposed that linguistic designation with 'Aryan' languages and argued that these language groups encapsulated the spirit of the groups who used them. The opposition of Aryan and Semite, however, was itself grafted onto the older distinction between Christians and Jews and onto the stereotypes and prejudices that characterized that antipathy, which in turn were shaped by some of the myths about Jews generated in the ancient Greco-Roman world. The very word 'anti-Semitism' thus encapsulates part of the complex history that this course will examine. We will discuss, evaluate and differentiate Judeophobia in the Greek and Roman world, the anti-Judaism of Christians as they defined themselves against the Synagogue, the association of the Devil and the Jews in the Middle Ages, the lives of Jews under the crescent of Islam, the Enlightenment's 'emancipation' from prejudice that nevertheless secularized anti-Judaism in the modern period, the fusion of anti-Semitism and nationalism, Nazi racial anti-Semitism and the Holocaust, and anti-Zionism and the 'new Judeophobia' in the third millennium. The course will thus survey “the longest hatred” as a means to understand the ways that anti-Semitism and racism have accommodated to changing circumstances. This will prove fertile ground for a broader understanding of how prejudice and stereotyping operates and for the consideration of strategies for disabling race thinking in the West.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherMemphis, Tenn. : Rhodes Collegeen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSyllabi CRN;23370-
dc.rightsRhodes College owns the rights to the archival digital objects in this collection. Objects are made available for educational use only and may not be used for any non-educational or commercial purpose. Approved educational uses include private research and scholarship, teaching, and student projects. For additional information please contact archives@rhodes.edu. Fees may apply.-
dc.subjectHistory, Department ofen_US
dc.subjectSyllabusen_US
dc.subjectTexten_US
dc.subjectCurriculumen_US
dc.subject2013 Springen_US
dc.titleHIST 405-02, The Fort Pillow Controversy, Spring 2013en_US
dc.typeSyllabusen_US
Appears in Collections:Course Syllabi

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2013_Spring_HIST 405_02_23370.pdf49.15 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.