Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10267/33410
Title: Confronting the Court: The Supreme Court, the Confrontation Clause, and the Ways They Interact
Authors: Elliott, Joshua D. (Daniel)
Advisors: Johnson, Renee J.
Keywords: URCAS;Student research;2018 Spring;Class of 2019;Political Science, Department of;Judicial process;Supreme Court of the United States;Confrontation Clause;Jurisprudence;Prelaw
Issue Date: 27-Apr-2018
Abstract: The Confrontation Clause, a collection of eighteen words contained within the Sixth Amendment, protects the right of the criminally accused to "be confronted with the witnesses against" him or her. Yet, as decades of Supreme Court litigation have sought to redefine this right, the meaning of the Confrontation Clause has changed noticeably. This paper seeks to determine what reasons may underlie the Supreme Court's decisions in Confrontation Clause litigation. By examining data collected from Supreme Court cases between 1953 and 1997 that deal with Confrontation, this paper uncovers the ideological tone of the lower court's opinion as one possible predictor of judicial decision-making of the Supreme Court.
Description: Presentation by Daniel Elliott ('19) delivered at the Rhodes College Undergraduate Research and Creative Activity Symposium (URCAS).
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10267/33410
Appears in Collections:Undergraduate Research and Creative Activity Symposium

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
201804_Elliott_Daniel_ConfrontingtheCourt_paper.pdf210.8 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
201804_Elliott_Daniel_ConfrontingtheCourt_slidedeck.pdf141.37 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.