Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10267/33598
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMcArthur, Robert Samuel Mills-
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-29T21:13:05Z-
dc.date.available2018-05-29T21:13:05Z-
dc.date.issued2013-05-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10267/33598-
dc.description.abstractIn the fifth century BCE, Athens both developed as a democracy and achieved naval superiority in the Aegean. The state's naval commitment lasted, mostly uninterrupted, until 322 BCE. The fleet, in turn, bolstered Athens' democracy. However, cooperation was not guaranteed. Elites—typically unfavorable to democracy, yet compelled to financially contribute to the navy—often opposed Athens' policies. Challenges of securing manpower and timber further threatened Athens' naval commitment. This thesis, applying Josiah Ober's theory of "knowledge alignment," explores ways that Athens sustained its commitment in spite of these challenges. Alignment strategies to promote cooperative action included public honors and symbolic monumental architecture.en_US
dc.subjectTexten_US
dc.subjectHonors papersen_US
dc.subjectGreek and Roman Studies, Department ofen_US
dc.titleCoordinating the Athenian Fleet: Cooperation and Common Knowledgeen_US
Appears in Collections:Honors Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
McArthur.Thesis.pdf463.28 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.