Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10267/3529
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Terjesen, Andrew James | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-02-27T17:51:27Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-02-27T17:51:27Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2007-08-22 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10267/3529 | - |
dc.description | This syllabus was submitted to the Rhodes College Office of Academic Affairs by the course instructor. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | This course will be a survey of the history of moral psychology, from Plato to the Twentieth Century. Moral psychology (in the context of the course) is the philosophy of moral agency – which means it is concerned with exploring questions regarding what it means to be a moral agent. The subject matter of moral psychology is not the same as an Ethics course – this course will not focus on questions regarding the nature of the good or how one ought to respond to particular moral controversies. Instead, this course will primarily questions regarding the aspects of moral agency referenced in the title, such as: 1) Must someone acquire certain character traits in order to become a moral agent? And if so, how do they acquire it? 2) Should our emotions play a role in moral deliberation? 3) Do we need to be able to understand the emotions of others in order to make moral judgments? 4) Is compassion sufficient to ensure moral action? 5) Do all humans share an innate sense of right and wrong? What would a moral sense be like? Rather than considering how one might justify one’s values (the subject matter of ethics), this course will examine how our beliefs about what is right and wrong influence our actions (as well as the ways in which they ought to influence our actions). In order to generate thoughtful reflection on the answers to these questions we will look at what some past thinkers have said [including Plato, Aristotle, Confucius, Mencius, Xunzi, Seneca, Augustine, Abelard, Aquinas, Hobbes, Hume, and Kant] and at current debates in moral psychology concerning the above-referenced topics. In addition, we will draw on recent work in the natural and social sciences to inform our discussions. | en_US |
dc.language | English(United States) | - |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Memphis, Tenn. : Rhodes College | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Syllabi CRN | en_US |
dc.rights | Rhodes College owns the rights to the archival digital images in this repository. Images are made available for educational use only and may not be used for any non-educational or commercial purpose. Approved educational uses include private research and scholarship, teaching, and student projects. For additional information please contact archives@rhodes.edu. Fees may apply. | - |
dc.subject | Philosophy, Department of | en_US |
dc.subject | Syllabus | en_US |
dc.subject | Curriculum | en_US |
dc.subject | Academic departments | en_US |
dc.subject | Text | en_US |
dc.subject | 2007 Fall | en_US |
dc.title | PHIL 250-02, Character, Empathy and the Moral Sense: The Past, Present and Future of Moral Psychology, Fall 2007 | en_US |
dc.type | Syllabus | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Course Syllabi |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
2007_fall_PHIL_250-02.pdf | 37.97 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.